What really bothers me is not so much that such a specious and hateful rumor would get started, but that people are so dumbed-down that they believe it! These are the same people that stated that the Equal Rights Amendment would take jobs away from men and lead to unisex bathrooms. These are the same people who believe that anyone with an African or middle eastern name must be an Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorist. Hubby's boss actually believes that Obama is part of a "sleeper cell" for that faction.
The ultra-conservative just cannot seem to back away from the tactics of spreading fear and slinging mud and delving into matters of personal lives that are none of their business. It worries me that this kind of hate-mongering and misinformation from these bombastic, conservative talk-show talking heads is going to light some wing-nut's fuse and then we would have a real problem.
To Rush and all his wannabe buddies on the radio talk circuit, it's time for you to do what the rest of us have done for the past eight, horrible years. SUCK IT UP!! I gave Dubya my support during 9/11 even though I was against everything he stood for. Now, it's your turn. Give our new commander-in-chief your support and the benefit of the doubt and quit spreading malice and the vitriol of the defeated. The election is over, Obama won and he won handily. That should tell you guys something.
If I had the power to do anything I wanted, I would remove this kind of viciousness from the airwaves, altogether. I know it smacks of censorship and I don't like that any more than any other moderate liberal. But this hate is almost of the pornographic level. I'd rather hear porn than hate if I had my druthers. At least sex has some relation to love. It's like I can tolerate sexuality in the media and entertainment fields until they try to justify child porn. There's a limit and that's where the term "moderate" comes in.
Well, there are limits in character assassination based on lies, innuendos and outright fantasy. We are tired of having our leaders chosen by the ignorant, who will believe anything the fear mongers say, and the haters and the users. Back off and ponder your sins, Oh, Limbaughs of the airwaves.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
What The Ignorant and The Biased Will Believe
What really bothers me is not so much that such a specious and hateful rumor would get started, but that people are so dumbed-down that they believe it! These are the same people that stated that the Equal Rights Amendment would take jobs away from men and lead to unisex bathrooms. These are the same people who believe that anyone with an African or middle eastern name must be an Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorist. Hubby's boss actually believes that Obama is part of a "sleeper cell" for that faction.
The ultra-conservative just cannot seem to back away from the tactics of spreading fear and slinging mud and delving into matters of personal lives that are none of their business. It worries me that this kind of hate-mongering and misinformation from these bombastic, conservative talk-show talking heads is going to light some wing-nut's fuse and then we would have a real problem.
To Rush and all his wannabe buddies on the radio talk circuit, it's time for you to do what the rest of us have done for the past eight, horrible years. SUCK IT UP!! I gave Dubya my support during 9/11 even though I was against everything he stood for. Now, it's your turn. Give our new commander-in-chief your support and the benefit of the doubt and quit spreading malice and the vitriol of the defeated. The election is over, Obama won and he won handily. That should tell you guys something.
If I had the power to do anything I wanted, I would remove this kind of viciousness from the airwaves, altogether. I know it smacks of censorship and I don't like that any more than any other moderate liberal. But this hate is almost of the pornographic level. I'd rather hear porn than hate if I had my druthers. At least sex has some relation to love. It's like I can tolerate sexuality in the media and entertainment fields until they try to justify child porn. There's a limit and that's where the term "moderate" comes in.
Well, there are limits in character assassination based on lies, innuendos and outright fantasy. We are tired of having our leaders chosen by the ignorant, who will believe anything the fear mongers say, and the haters and the users. Back off and ponder your sins, Oh, Limbaughs of the airwaves.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Don't It Turn My Red State Blue
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Waiter, There's a Church In My State
If anyone has forgotten their world history to the point that they can't understand all the implications of this part of the First Amendment to the Constitution, we can take a little walk down memory lane.
In Europe, prior to the colonization of the American continent and for years, thereafter, state religions were a fact of life. In some countries, the clergy carried as much and, in some cases, more, authority than the monarchy. The church, mostly the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches, were involved in the making of laws, the decisions to make wars, and the education of the young. Moreover, they had the right to persecute those who either held other religious beliefs, were agnostic, atheistic or of a scientific or humanist bent. In one of the most horrendous chapters of European history, the Catholic clerics were given free rein to torment and torture so-called "heretics" and to put them to death. NO minority religion, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Protestantism or any other belief was tolerated by either the church or the governing bodies. These were the Spanish and Italian Inquisitions, an era that should have taught the civilized world a lesson about separation of church and state.
Because they were among the persecuted, a small, Protestant sect called the Puritans emigrated to the "new world" and set up a colony in which they could practice their religion, freely. These Puritans were to form the basis for much of the fundamentalist religion that spread throughout the nation as the country was formed. Unfortunately, the Puritans immediately began, upon founding their colony, to do to others exactly what was done to them and that was to establish Puritanism as the only "true" religion.
The idea of separation of church and state embodied in the First Amendment was a very good idea on the part of our founding fathers. Most of them, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, were basically Theists. They believed in a Supreme Being but in no particular doctrine or dogma. It is plain to see that freedom OF religion also, by implication, then, guards our right to freedom FROM religion. Christianity is NOT the "official state religion" of the United States Of America.
That is not to say that there are not hordes of pious, "true believers" who think it should be and who think that their doctrine, their interpretation of scripture and their dogma should be the law of the land. These folks are the ones who whine that the Ten Commandments (a Judaic system of religious law) should be allowed to be posted in government buildings, who push Christian school prayer on non-Christian students and who stand out in front of women's clinics shouting hate and hellfire at the women and staff who enter.
Ever since its inception, they have battled against Roe v Wade and a woman's right to choose. And, now that it looks like they have received a set-back in that area, they are getting louder and more annoying than ever. The operative word here is CHOICE. If your religious beliefs prohibit termination of a pregnancy, then don't do it. It's as simple as that. But you good old boy, patriarchal pastors and pulpit pounders need to keep your noses OUT of what I, my daughters, my granddaughter, my great-granddaugter and all other women not of your spiritual persuasion do with their bodies.
Churches are ubiquitous in the USA. They are on every street corner. Some are magnificent edifices, some are picturesque, rustic and sweet. Some are modern, some are traditional and they all serve an important purpose for the individual who chooses one of those churches for their own. There, they are free to practice the religion of their choice with no government intrusion or persecution. People are christened, baptized, married and buried within the tenets of these churches. They are a part of life and to be cherished.
BUT, they have no business in the halls of government. Those two things, religion and government, are separate entities for a very good reason. No one religion should have the power to dictate belief to the masses and no government should be telling its citizens what to believe when it comes to spiritual matters. We've gotten away from that simple truth in many ways, but, with luck and the right kind of leadership, maybe we can find our way back to the Bill of Rights and really understand what it all means. Idealistic thinking, for sure, but it is my ferverent hope that we can do this thing and make it stick.
Oh, and as I understand it, the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons) have one state, Utah, in their pocket. Let's not let them have the other 49.
Friday, November 14, 2008
What Is Socialism and Why Are We So Afraid Of It?
My husband's poor boss is still broken-hearted about the election results. He walks around with a hang-dog expression on his face, muttering inaccuracies about socialism and communism and the ruination of the "American Way of Life." Of course, this man is Rush Limbaugh's number one fan.
What he doesn't seem to understand is that many countries, mostly western European nations and even Canada, with Democratic political systems have some level of socialism in their governmental programs. Even WE do. Why do you think they call it "Social" Security? Then there is free primary education, school lunch and breakfast programs, etc., etc.
Socialism and Communism are not the same thing. In any event, the past four years and the current economic disaster shows what happens when pure Capitalism runs amok. All you have to do is look at the growing gap between the wealthy and the average citizen and watch those ex-CEO's riding their golden parachutes to self-serving, fiscal safety to see that there must be some kind of balance. "Trickle down" only works if the money is released by the big businesses in order to make it down the "trickle" path. It's not working.
The following quote was taken from "The Heartland Project: Simple Truths For A Shameful Time."
"Socialism is not a political system, it's a way of distributing goods and services. At their ideal implementation, socialism and laissez faire capitalism will be identical as everyone will produce exactly what's needed for exactly who needs it.
"Socialism is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the economy works. Democracy is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the government works. "Democracy," said Marx, "is the road to socialism." He was wrong about how economics and politics interact, but he did see their similar underpinnings.
Communism is conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just the Party Secretary) have any say in how the economy works. Republicans are conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just people controlling the Party figurehead) have any say in how the government works. The conservatives in the US are in the same position as the communists in the 30s, and for the same reason: Their revolutions failed spectacularly but they refuse to admit what went wrong.
A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are "socialist" in the same way that Republicans are "compassionate conservatives". That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing."
It seems that what so many fear is nothing more than the adoption by our nation of a social conscience that reaches out to those who truly need the help rather than padding the pockets of big-business political contributors and cronies. I am not ashamed or afraid to say that I believe we could use a little socialism in our political mix.
For those of you who benefit from labor and professional unions...hey, that's socialism on a smaller scale. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but I would be willing to bet that few to none of you have secret rooms where the flag bearing the hammer and sickle is hanging on the wall.
We have drug companies and medical equipment manufacturers, HMO's, PPO's and primary health insurance companies all getting richer and richer from the suffering of the sick. Some of those sick people cannot afford insurance of any sort. Some get by with Medicare and state Medicaid programs. Many are uninsured children and families with limited income.
Many more are senior citizens (I'm one) who are increasing in numbers and in need of health services. Yet we have that ridiculous "doughnut hole" stipulation in our Medicare, Part D coverage and most of the drugs we depend on are too expensive for us to afford. Many of us are getting our prescriptions through Canada, drugs that are manufactured in India and may not be as effective as the ones we get here in the US. My husband has Crohn's, we both have arthritis and I am pre-diabetic. Where does this leave us? Hubby reached his doughnut hole early in the year. Luckily, right now, all my drugs are either inexpensive or generic, but, at my age, that could change.
So, from the viewpoint of the seniors, the poor and the disenfranchised, socialised medicine or "universal health care" doesn't sound like a bad thing. Think about it.
And, as Mr. Marx, in the picture at the top of this post is saying, "Peace, Y'all."
Thursday, November 13, 2008
NY Daily News..Palin Not Welcomed
